Join for FREE | Take the Tour Lost Password?
[x]

deviantART

 
©2008-2009 ~hoboinaschoolbus
:iconhoboinaschoolbus:

Artist's Comments

It's a fine line between darkroom and photomanip, huh?
Anyway I edited ([link]) a bit. Been bored, can't go out shooting... :(

Comments


love 2 2 joy 0 0 wow 1 1 mad 0 0 sad 0 0 fear 0 0 neutral 0 0
:iconkellock:
awww so pretty ^^

--
Rustic B.

[link]
:iconpaw-br:
Looks really pretty, and you made the colors look so so good...

--
100% made of true Argentinian fail

Se habla español <3
:iconparabola-pop:
Great! Love the composition!
:iconafreespirit:
Wow. This picture is almost magic. It's as if the tiger were some sort of ghost.. no, ANGEL. I like angel better. Not so scary. :floating:

But you never cease to amaze me with your outstanding photography skills.

btw: are you shooting through a glass enclosure? fence?

Or are you just right there with them? :aww:
If so, tell me how and when to get there. :excited:

--
That was the scary part, that someone understood me.
:iconhoboinaschoolbus:
Thank you :) This one was either taken through glass or fence, can't remember which. Their enclosure is surrounded by both. Fence is rarely a problem, as long as the animal is relatively far from it and you are close, you can focus right through it and no bars :) Shaded spots(on the bars) help eliminate them, too :)

Sometimes glass can be the devil :(
I thought of the angel/devil dichotomy, too :) How about a friendly ghost? hahaha

--
[link] <- my wildlife photography
:iconredbeard31:
good job on the edit. be careful what you put in the photo manipulation category. i got scolded last year because the definition now says it has to be composed of at least two pictures. now i put my heavily edited shots in digital darkroom or in the appropriate photographic category.

--
is it more altruistic to worship, or actually help fellow man?~nofx
:iconhoboinaschoolbus:
Thanks for the comment :)
Ah, I suppose that would make sense. I consider anything done to a photo besides development a photomanipulation, but don't think there's anything wrong with tidying up a photo a little bit.

Sometimes the categories on this site just baffle me :|

--
[link] <- my wildlife photography
:iconredbeard31:
to me, when it becomes obvious that alteration has taken place, then it is a manipulation. cleaning up a picture or correcting the color is just part of the development process to me. but i play by the rules that dA has set down (most of the time).

--
is it more altruistic to worship, or actually help fellow man?~nofx
:iconhoboinaschoolbus:
My theory is, if the viewers can't tell, it really just doesn't matter =P
I don't usually change colors at all, except maybe levels (although CS2 is changing that...), but I have been touching up small blotches, fences, etc, for a while. No one can tell, but does that mean I'm not a photographer? Pure silliness!

--
[link] <- my wildlife photography
:iconredbeard31:
you're preaching to the choir! i do most of my work outside, so i am always dealing with changing light conditions, and i don't always remember to change my white balance. i make plenty of corrections during the development from RAW format to compensate for my own inattentiveness.

--
is it more altruistic to worship, or actually help fellow man?~nofx

Details

February 18, 2008
651 KB
651 KB
534×802

Statistics

47
292 [who?]
2,374 (7 today)
2 (0 today)

Site Map